webm
09-26 03:47 PM
I think that EAD/AP are not dependent/tied to the employer?
No.. it's not tied to the employer..
No.. it's not tied to the employer..
wallpaper wallpaper Rose Covered Cottage Pixel rose drawing outline. of flower outline
Dipika
04-27 10:19 AM
I am EB3 - Dec 2004 filer and there is no hope for few years that my date get current. i have filed another GC through my sister in May 2006 and that F4 category is moving quicker and expecting my priority date will be current in 5 years through my sister.
i have bought 2 Family house in Jersey City. now for my kids education we thought to move to India for 4 to 5 years until we get call for GC though my sister.
we are going to rent house - it's multi family near NYC. my landloard is willing to take care of it in our absence.
my Q is can i get B1 (Visitor visa) for 10 years , if we show that we have property in US and we may need to visit just to take check it ??
should we inform immigration officer about GC filed though my sister to assure that we will not stay in US longer, to get B1 visa?
can we get visitor visa before leaving USA? i mean convert from H1 to B1 for multi year?
i have bought 2 Family house in Jersey City. now for my kids education we thought to move to India for 4 to 5 years until we get call for GC though my sister.
we are going to rent house - it's multi family near NYC. my landloard is willing to take care of it in our absence.
my Q is can i get B1 (Visitor visa) for 10 years , if we show that we have property in US and we may need to visit just to take check it ??
should we inform immigration officer about GC filed though my sister to assure that we will not stay in US longer, to get B1 visa?
can we get visitor visa before leaving USA? i mean convert from H1 to B1 for multi year?
jim
09-06 11:54 PM
My I-140 approved in Aug 2007,My employer has withdrawn the I-140 in july but still it is approved in Aug 2007,Now my employer is agreed and want to sent the letter to USCIS not to withdrawn this I-140,As I am in Canada so they are planning to file the I-824 for me for Consular processing,so please advice do they need to file the new I-140 for me for Consular processing as they sent the withdrawn letter to uscis or is it ok for them to sent the letter again to uscis and telling them not to withdrawn this case and file I-824 for CP.Please advice!!!!!!
2011 wallpaper Horse Drawing Outline rose drawing outline. Outline rose
bbct
02-21 01:11 PM
There is a long running thread on this -
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=18085
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=18085
more...
dreamgc_real
02-01 08:48 AM
F1 - Immigration Wiki (http://immigrationvoice.org/wiki/index.php/F1)
Talk to your guidance counselor, they will be in a better position to provide you with advice.
Talk to your guidance counselor, they will be in a better position to provide you with advice.
webm
07-24 03:58 PM
how can we monitor the process (the processing dates then become irrelevant)...
This is the big question everyone has..I know processing dates are meant only for crazy..no FIFO,random,IO mercy etc..:(
This is the big question everyone has..I know processing dates are meant only for crazy..no FIFO,random,IO mercy etc..:(
more...
sm_baru
07-28 11:11 PM
Dear All,
I've approved H1 until Apr 2011 (expired stamping in the passport) and also have EAD (I applied 485 when my family was out of country, my mistake). But as my family don't have their 485 applied, I have to be on H1. Now my confusion is when I travel out of country can I use AP to re-enter or I have to use H1 only as my family is on H4?
Thanks a lot for your help.
I've approved H1 until Apr 2011 (expired stamping in the passport) and also have EAD (I applied 485 when my family was out of country, my mistake). But as my family don't have their 485 applied, I have to be on H1. Now my confusion is when I travel out of country can I use AP to re-enter or I have to use H1 only as my family is on H4?
Thanks a lot for your help.
2010 rose rose drawing outline.
simplequestion
03-15 09:18 AM
I am trying set up an appointment for the last week of April (Apr 27-May 1) in Matamoros, Mexico and came across the following website about their wait times:
http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/wait/tempvisitors_wait_result.php?post=Matamoros&x=46&y=12
For Matamoros, it says
Typical Wait Time (Calendar Days*) for a Nonimmigrant Visa Interview Appointment
Visitors Visas: 15 Days
Student/Exchange Visitors Visas *** (Excludes: A, G, K, and V): 15 Days
All Other Nonimmigrant Visas: 15 Days
Typical Wait Time (Workdays**) for a Nonimmigrant Visa To Be Processed****: 28 Days
1) Does it mean that I can setup my H1-B Visa Appointment only before 15 days of Apr 27th?
2) What does Typical Wait Time (Workdays**) for a Nonimmigrant Visa To Be Processed****: 28 Days mean? Does it mean that it will typically take 28 days to get Visa stamping after your interview?
Thanks
http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/wait/tempvisitors_wait_result.php?post=Matamoros&x=46&y=12
For Matamoros, it says
Typical Wait Time (Calendar Days*) for a Nonimmigrant Visa Interview Appointment
Visitors Visas: 15 Days
Student/Exchange Visitors Visas *** (Excludes: A, G, K, and V): 15 Days
All Other Nonimmigrant Visas: 15 Days
Typical Wait Time (Workdays**) for a Nonimmigrant Visa To Be Processed****: 28 Days
1) Does it mean that I can setup my H1-B Visa Appointment only before 15 days of Apr 27th?
2) What does Typical Wait Time (Workdays**) for a Nonimmigrant Visa To Be Processed****: 28 Days mean? Does it mean that it will typically take 28 days to get Visa stamping after your interview?
Thanks
more...
Blog Feeds
08-30 09:40 PM
A Democratic Senator working on immigration reform says a bill is not happening this year. Is this news?
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/from-the-department-of-no-duh.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/from-the-department-of-no-duh.html)
hair hair rose drawing outline. rose justin bieber drawing outline. rose drawing
clif
06-28 12:57 PM
My wife filed I-539 for changing status from H-4 to F-1 at end of May. We have the receipt and the case is now pending. Is it possible for her to request cancellation of this change of status and continue in H-4 status? If so, does anyone know how to ask USCIS for this?
more...
whitecollarslave
02-10 11:49 PM
2 - You can work for multiple employers using EAD. Typically EAD will not have any restrictions other than how long it is valid for.
hot rose drawing outline. outline
G
01-25 08:25 AM
I just started my first real site for a local jaguar showroom but I'm looking for more work for a portfolio site I'm working on.
My skills include:-
HTML (advanced)
Javascript (intermediate)
PHP (intermediate)
Flash (intermediate)
Photoshop (intermediate)
Swift 3D (intermediate)
Illustrator (intermediate)
Corel Draw (intermediate)
Please send me an email if you are interested - g_barnettuk@hotmail.com
My skills include:-
HTML (advanced)
Javascript (intermediate)
PHP (intermediate)
Flash (intermediate)
Photoshop (intermediate)
Swift 3D (intermediate)
Illustrator (intermediate)
Corel Draw (intermediate)
Please send me an email if you are interested - g_barnettuk@hotmail.com
more...
house images Picture new justin bieber justin bieber drawing outline. rose drawing
morchu
06-11 09:18 AM
Yes.
My I-485 is pending with EB3 Feb 2006 priority date. Invoked AC21 and currently working for a different employer. Have Masters degree and 9+ years of experience.
Is there a way to re-apply for Green Card under EB2 category thru a 3rd employer and retain the old EB3 priority date?
Thanks in advance.
My I-485 is pending with EB3 Feb 2006 priority date. Invoked AC21 and currently working for a different employer. Have Masters degree and 9+ years of experience.
Is there a way to re-apply for Green Card under EB2 category thru a 3rd employer and retain the old EB3 priority date?
Thanks in advance.
tattoo tree drawing outline. on
rajarao
07-17 05:41 PM
Congratulations to IV for leading everyone. Good job everyone.
:)
:)
more...
pictures rose outline red by andrew j
NeelSona
01-14 12:15 PM
Hi,
I am staying in USA and now I will like to apply Canada Work permit VISA, I need following basic information
1. Which site I can apply Canada Work permits VISA and Which VISA type?
2. Do we need any sponsor there in Canada?
Thanks,
-neelsona
I am staying in USA and now I will like to apply Canada Work permit VISA, I need following basic information
1. Which site I can apply Canada Work permits VISA and Which VISA type?
2. Do we need any sponsor there in Canada?
Thanks,
-neelsona
dresses rose drawing outline.
roseball
08-19 08:55 AM
1. When I apply for a new H1B after 1 year break, does the H1B comes under the quota or will it be considered on previously held H1B quota.
It will be counted in the quota
2. How sure about getting approval of H1B.
Well, if you have a job offer for which you qualify and all relevant supporting documents, I dont see why you wont get the approval.
It will be counted in the quota
2. How sure about getting approval of H1B.
Well, if you have a job offer for which you qualify and all relevant supporting documents, I dont see why you wont get the approval.
more...
makeup images makeup Pretty drawing outline rose drawing outline.
visacase
07-10 02:41 PM
Hi,
Thanks for my previous response. I am on H1B and between projects. I have an offer to work for a couple of days for a company other than the one holding my H1B. They said they are not gonna report to the IRS as its an hourly job for 2 days and the number of hours are not going to accumulate enough for the IRS. But they need my SSN or tax-payer ID to run their payroll. I am gonna receive my dues as a simple check (like a rebate check with just the total amount showing up & NOT a paystub). Please let me know if I can work for them or not.
Thanks for my previous response. I am on H1B and between projects. I have an offer to work for a couple of days for a company other than the one holding my H1B. They said they are not gonna report to the IRS as its an hourly job for 2 days and the number of hours are not going to accumulate enough for the IRS. But they need my SSN or tax-payer ID to run their payroll. I am gonna receive my dues as a simple check (like a rebate check with just the total amount showing up & NOT a paystub). Please let me know if I can work for them or not.
girlfriend hot rose outline rose drawing outline. Tribal outline drawing
Macaca
08-05 08:12 AM
A Bad Deal Gets Worse (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/05/opinion/05sun2.html) August 5, 2007
President Bush is understandably desperate for some kind of foreign policy success. But that cannot justify sacrificing his principled stand against weapons proliferation to seal a nuclear cooperation deal with India. The agreement could end up benefiting New Delhi�s weapons program as much as its pursuit of nuclear power.
The deal was deeply flawed from the start. And it has been made even worse by a newly negotiated companion agreement that lays out the technical details for nuclear commerce. Congress should reject the agreement and demand that the administration, or its successor, negotiate a new one that does not undermine efforts to restrain the spread of nuclear weapons.
Any agreement needs to honor the principle Mr. Bush set forth in 2004: that countries do not need to make their own nuclear fuel, or reprocess their spent fuel, to operate effective nuclear energy programs. The technology can be all too easily diverted to make fuel for a nuclear weapon.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bush�s accord with India jettisoned that essential principle. Washington capitulated to India�s nuclear establishment and endorsed continued reprocessing. And while United States law calls for nuclear cooperation to end if India detonates another weapon, the agreement makes no explicit mention of that requirement � while it promises that Washington will acquiesce, if not assist, in India�s efforts to find other fuel suppliers.
Bringing India � which never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty � in from the cold is not a bad idea. It is the world�s most populous democracy, with a dynamic economy. And its record on nonproliferation � aside from its own diversion of civilian technology to its once-secret weapons program � is pretty good. The problem is that the United States got very little back. No promise to stop producing bomb-making material. No promise not to expand its arsenal. And no promise not to resume nuclear testing.
The message of all this is unmistakable: When it comes to nuclear proliferation, Washington�s only real policy is to reward its friends and punish its enemies. Suspicion of America�s motives around the world are high enough. America cannot afford another such blow to its credibility, especially when it is trying to rally international pressure against nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea.
The administration will argue that altering this agreement now would be a slap at India. But there is no good in compounding a bad deal. And there are better ways to deepen political and economic ties.
Congress accepted the administration�s arguments far too uncritically when it approved the first India-related nuclear legislation last December. It must now take a stand against the even more damaging companion agreement. At a time when far too many governments are re-examining their decision to forswear nuclear weapons, the United States should be shoring up the nuclear rules, not shredding them.
President Bush is understandably desperate for some kind of foreign policy success. But that cannot justify sacrificing his principled stand against weapons proliferation to seal a nuclear cooperation deal with India. The agreement could end up benefiting New Delhi�s weapons program as much as its pursuit of nuclear power.
The deal was deeply flawed from the start. And it has been made even worse by a newly negotiated companion agreement that lays out the technical details for nuclear commerce. Congress should reject the agreement and demand that the administration, or its successor, negotiate a new one that does not undermine efforts to restrain the spread of nuclear weapons.
Any agreement needs to honor the principle Mr. Bush set forth in 2004: that countries do not need to make their own nuclear fuel, or reprocess their spent fuel, to operate effective nuclear energy programs. The technology can be all too easily diverted to make fuel for a nuclear weapon.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bush�s accord with India jettisoned that essential principle. Washington capitulated to India�s nuclear establishment and endorsed continued reprocessing. And while United States law calls for nuclear cooperation to end if India detonates another weapon, the agreement makes no explicit mention of that requirement � while it promises that Washington will acquiesce, if not assist, in India�s efforts to find other fuel suppliers.
Bringing India � which never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty � in from the cold is not a bad idea. It is the world�s most populous democracy, with a dynamic economy. And its record on nonproliferation � aside from its own diversion of civilian technology to its once-secret weapons program � is pretty good. The problem is that the United States got very little back. No promise to stop producing bomb-making material. No promise not to expand its arsenal. And no promise not to resume nuclear testing.
The message of all this is unmistakable: When it comes to nuclear proliferation, Washington�s only real policy is to reward its friends and punish its enemies. Suspicion of America�s motives around the world are high enough. America cannot afford another such blow to its credibility, especially when it is trying to rally international pressure against nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea.
The administration will argue that altering this agreement now would be a slap at India. But there is no good in compounding a bad deal. And there are better ways to deepen political and economic ties.
Congress accepted the administration�s arguments far too uncritically when it approved the first India-related nuclear legislation last December. It must now take a stand against the even more damaging companion agreement. At a time when far too many governments are re-examining their decision to forswear nuclear weapons, the United States should be shoring up the nuclear rules, not shredding them.
hairstyles How to draw a rose step 3
Dakota Newfie
01-14 01:56 PM
I am sure there are others in the fine State of South Dakota besides me???
I am a Canadian in the "Approved I-140, waiting for 485 Limbo" status. I have a prority date of March, 2004. I find IV a good source of both information and encouragement and I would like to know there are others near me who feel the same. Hope to hear from you soon?
Dakota Newfie
I am a Canadian in the "Approved I-140, waiting for 485 Limbo" status. I have a prority date of March, 2004. I find IV a good source of both information and encouragement and I would like to know there are others near me who feel the same. Hope to hear from you soon?
Dakota Newfie
Almond
04-21 09:35 PM
If we're thinking of the same thing, the cover letter basically is a simple letter that explains what is in the package and what is the purpose of the package/envelope/application. It enumerates all the documents enclosed, almost like a checklist. You don't have to enclose it but it'd be good to do so not just for you but also for the person opening your package so they know if you enclosed something that they're looking for. It kind of keeps the whole thing organized.
cygent
08-23 10:56 PM
Any success stories / anybody in progress (we can form a team/strategize?) - Or could you point me towards a related thread?
PD March, 2005 EB3
Labor - RIR, Approved 04/2007
I-140 filed 06/2007 (pending)
I-485 filed 07/2007 (of course pending)
Case - Working for petitioning Employer who is folding up :mad:.
Is there a difference b/w a company folding vs. getting bought out or changed name, etc. Any insight will be greatly appreciated with good karma.
PD March, 2005 EB3
Labor - RIR, Approved 04/2007
I-140 filed 06/2007 (pending)
I-485 filed 07/2007 (of course pending)
Case - Working for petitioning Employer who is folding up :mad:.
Is there a difference b/w a company folding vs. getting bought out or changed name, etc. Any insight will be greatly appreciated with good karma.
No comments:
Post a Comment